Day 1986.06.17PC

Planning Commission - Regular Meeting
City of Vacaville
7:30 p.m. - City Council Chambers    June 17, 1986

CALL TO ORDER:
    The regular meeting of the City Planning Commission was called to order at 7:30 P.M. by Chairman Matsuhara.

PRESENT:    Chairman Matsuhara, Commissioner Breece, Commissioner Brewer, Commissioner Gjervold, Commissioner Rasmussen.
ABSENT:    Vice Chairman Rajander, Commissioner McCulley
ALSO PRESENT:    Planning Director Werner, Senior Planner Sexton, Associate Planner Traut, Assistant Planner Buderi, and Assistant Public Works Director Baird

COMMUNICATIONS:
A.    Two letters of opposition to Item No. 4 from John Yolo and Anthony Concilla

MISCELLANEOUS:
    None

1.    CONSENT CALENDAR
    None

2.    GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT - CIRCULATION ELEMENT
    a.    Environmental Assessment (EA-12-86)
    b.    General Plan Amendment (GP-3-86)
    Pertains to a request to amend the Circulation Element of the General Plan for a proposed new arterial/expressway from California Drive (near Irene Larson School) to I-80 (near Davis Street).  The proposed street would be located within the abandoned right-of-way of the Sacramento Northern Railroad.

    Director Werner reviewed the proposal and introduced the staff report dated June 17, 1986 into the record, noting that the proposed new street offers the most usable opportunity to accommodate the projected traffic in southern Vacaville.  Impacts of the street are proposed to be mitigated and a partial funding source is available.  Approval of the general plan amendment was recommended.

PUBLIC HEARING:
Those speaking in favor of the project:
    Arnold Johnson representing TJKM Transportation consultants gave a brief review of the traffic report.

    Jim Farha, a real estate agent agreed that this would be a good alternative for a new road.

Those speaking in opposition to the project:
    Arthur Feidler, 272 Coronado Court, felt it would be a hazard for kids going to school.  His neighborhood would loose its rural atmosphere and he didn't feel the road would relieve the congestion.

    Julie Lealand, 894 Kingman Drive, stated it would be hard to get off of Kingman Drive because of traffic buildup at the intersection coming off and on the road.  It will cause air and noise pollution and the possibility of crime in the area.

    Mr. Shefield, 859 Kingman Drive, wanted to know the costs.  He didn't feel that there was really 100 ft. available, and wanted a second opinion on the traffic survey.

    Charles Jones, 1660 Alamo Drive, said his property value would drop, and it would be a hazard to his children.
    Resident of the area stated that the affect of the surrounding people should be considered first.

    Marge Albecetti, 1791 Alamo Drive, did not want a traffic light right next to her home or put up with the construction of a new road.

    Debra Feidler 272 Coronado Court, this will greatly affect the quality of their life and residents will do all they can to stop the project.

    Peggy Boso, 244 Bowline, wanted to know how much of her backyard she would loose.

    Margaret Salvador, 1654 Alamo Drive, her house value would drop and she would not be able to sell her house.

    Dave Shall 1649 Alamo Drive, concerned about noise level.

    Peter English 645 Cordelia, suggested a 4th alternative of reducing development in the south side of town by rezoning the land.

    Bonnie Calli, wanted to know who would compensate property owners for loss of property value.

Public Hearing Closed.

COMMISSION COMMENTS:
    Commissioner Rasmussen felt it was a unique opportunity to solve the traffic problem.

    Commissioner Brewer stressed that it would be 5-10 years before this happened and it would be better for Vacaville as a whole.

    Commissioner Breece, felt the sacrifice to residents would be too great and that other alternatives should be looked into.

    Commissioner Gjervold felt is was a good opportunity to take advantage of street improvements.

    Chairman Matsuhara was concerned about setbacks for adjoining residents and felt other alternative should be looked into.

COMMISSION ACTION:
    Commissioner Brewer moved, Rasmussen seconded, that the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council approve the General Plan Amendment - Circulation Element.  Motion approved 3-2 (no:  Matsuhara, Breece)

    Chairman Matsuhara called a recess at 8:50.  The meeting was called to order at 9:00 p.m.

3.    LYDON VARIANCE
    a.    Variance (V-18-86)
    Pertains to a request to allow an existing illegal structure to encroach 10' within the 10' required side yard and remain at the present 0' building setback at 172 N. Alamo Drive.

    Assistant Planner Buderi reviewed the proposal and introduced the staff report dated June 17 into the record, noting that

    Staff recommended denial of the project.

PUBLIC HEARING:
Those speaking in favor of the project:
    Linda Lydon, applicant, said that the structure was built with good intentions.  She presented a petition from the neighbors stating it was a nice addition to the neighborhood.

    James Lydon, applicant, said he would comply with Building's memo, but wanted to know why he was being signaled out.

Those speaking in opposition to the project:
    None.

Public Hearing Closed.

COMMISSION COMMENTS:
    Commissioner Gjervold commented that they needed to set a precedence.
    Commissioner Breece felt that the project needed more consideration.
    Commissioner Brewer approved of the addition.
    Commissioner Rasmussen felt is should be denied.
    Chairman Matsuhara stated he would consider approving a scaled down version.

COMMISSION ACTION:
    Commissioner Brewer Motioned, Rasmussen seconded to deny the variance. Motion approved 5-0.

4.    GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
    a.    Environmental Assessment (REA-33-86)
    b.    General Plan Amendment (GP-2-86 "A")
    Pertains to a request to amend the Land Use and Open Space Elements of the General Plan for approximately 980 acres located along the east side of I-505 and south of Midway Road, and south of I-80 between Lewis Road and Leisure Town Road. The proposal involves the redesignation of the "N.E.V.A.D.A." properties from UR-20 (Urban Reserve - 20 acre min.), A-40 (Agricultural - 40 acre min.), R2 1/2 acre lots) and I (Industrial).  The proposal also may potentially involve changes to the Circulation and Public Services and Utilities Elements of the General Plan.

    Senior Planner Sexton reviewed the proposal and introduced the staff report dated June 17, 1986 into the record, noting that

PUBLIC HEARING:
Those speaking in favor of the project:
    Stephen Brothers of Land Development Consultants, representing Chevron.

    Jim Farha, Real Estate Broker, representing Ashwill property.

    Tom Merle, Chevron Land and Development

    Matt Carpenter, City Planner, representing Behren/Calton property.

Those speaking in opposition to the project:
    Kathleen Lynch, of 4049 Lewis Road asked that the City wait to find out if the atomic collider locates here before changing the land to industrial.

Public Hearing Closed.

COMMISSION COMMENTS:
    Chairman Matsuhara asked that a "straw vote" be taken for each item of the recommendation:
    1.a. - Per staff recommendation (3-2)
    1.b. - Per staff recommendation (5-0)
    1.c. - Per staff recommendation (5-0)
    1.d. - Redesignate 28 acre Ashwill Property to "CH" (3-2)
    1.e. - Per staff recommendation (5-0)
    1.f. - Per staff recommendation (5-0)
    1.g. - Per staff recommendation (5-0)
    1.h. - Per staff recommendation (5-0)
    2.   - Per staff recommendation (5-0)
    3.a. - Per staff recommendation (5-0)
    3.b. - Per staff recommendation (5-0)

    Chairman Matsuhara noted that the straw vote would be made into a recommendation at the next meeting with Component "B" of the General Plan Amendment.

5.    U.C. REGENTS
    Chairman Matsuhara moved, Commissioner Breece seconded to continue this item to the July 1 meeting.

6.    COPPERFIELD ESTATES
    Chairman Matsuhara moved, Commissioner Breece seconded to continue this item to the July 1 meeting.

7.    APPROVAL OF FY 1986-87 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS BUDGET
    The Commission found the recommendation to be consistent with the General Plan.

8.    DIRECTOR'S REPORT
    a.    Update on City Council actions pertaining to Planning Commission items, including General Plan Policy on Housing Mix.

9.    COMMISSION COMMENTS
    None

10.    ADJOURNMENT:
    The regular meeting of the City Planning Commission was adjourned at 11:55 p.m.

Respectfully submitted,

Mary Page, Deputy Recording Secretary